mckeed 42 minutes ago

Fun post! I drew the first 5 iterations by hand myself and I'm finding it easiest to think of as a self-similar coloring of a square tesselation.

If you start with the shape of iteration 3, it tessellates as a 5x5 square tile. Make an infinite grid of those tile shapes with one iteration 3 version in the center. Treat that center tile as the center square in the iteration 3 pattern and color the tiles around it according to how the 2nd and 3rd iterations were built of squares. This gives you the 4th and 5th iteration and you can continue to iterate on the coloring outwards to color the grid of tiles in the wallflower pattern.

CliffStoll 20 hours ago

Outstanding work and a delightful read.

  • chriskw 20 hours ago

    Thanks Cliff, it means a ton coming from you! The videos from you and all the other folks on Numberphile always inspired me to see the beauty in math growing up :)

    • speeder 10 hours ago

      Please you two, make an awesome YouTube vídeo out of this. It is fascinating and beatiful and deserves a chance to viralize a little :)

nico a day ago

Amazing insightful and thoughtful write up, thank you!

Loved the 3d visualizations

It reminds me of this thing I built some time ago while playing with recursive decimation to generate effects similar to fractals from any image

You can play with it here: https://jsfiddle.net/nicobrenner/a1t869qf/

Just press Blursort 2x2 a couple of times to generate a few frames and then click Animate

You can also copy/paste images into it

There’s no backend, it all just runs on the browser

Don’t recommend it on mobile

  • Iwan-Zotow 21 hours ago

    Curious if it would work in 3D

    • nico 21 hours ago

      Very interesting! I wonder what that would look like

      Right now, roughly, the algorithm recursively divides the image by doing decimation (ie. picking every other pixel), and keeps the decimated pixels as a second image

      Not sure how that algorithm would apply to a 3d data structure

      Do you know how 3d objects/images are usually represented?

      It would be cool to recursively decompose a 3d object into smaller versions of itself :)

Cogito 13 hours ago

Thought I'd check the arithmetic for 2 two-digit numbers, and it works!

I expect 41+14 to be 12 (two right plus two up equals two right and two up).

Long addition in long form below uses:

'=' to show equivalent lines (reordering of terms (1+2=2+1), spliting numbers (41=40+1), adding single digits (1+4=22))

'->' for when the algorithm gives a digit

'<' for when we move over a column

    41+14
    = (40+1)+(10+4)
    = 40 + 10 + (1+4)
    = 40 + 10 + 22
    -> 1s digit = 2
    < 4 + 1 + 2
    = 22 + 2
    = 20 + 2 + 2
    = 20 + 41
    -> 10s digit = 1
    < 2 + 4
    = 0
    -> done
    == 12
[edit] Just noticed the article has two different numbering systems, one where 10, 20, 30, 40 are clockwise and one where they are anticlockwise. In both, 1, 2, 3, 4 are clockwise. My addition is on the second, where 10s are anticlockwise (this is what is used in the addition table).

It still works in the alternative system (14+21 should equal 12)

    14+21
    =10+20+42
    ->2
    <1+2+4
    =13+4
    =10+3+4
    =10+31
    ->1
    <1+3
    =0
    ==12
taeric a day ago

Holy cow, I was expecting a quick read. Wound up having to skim some, as I need to get some work today. Will be coming back to this to play with some. Really well done!

wistlo 2 hours ago

This is so much better than reading the news.

Favorited—I'll be coming back to absorb more, as my aging semi-fluency in engineering physics and SQL doesn't help much with the notation I last saw in the 1980s.

baq 12 hours ago

This went much deeper and harder than expected. One has to admire the dedication.

Question to the author: what would you recommend to hang on my kid’s wall today?

  • chriskw 11 hours ago

    I'm by no means a parenting expert, but my answer would be anything related to something they feel passion or wonder for in the moment. I snuck in a paragraph near the end about burnout. At the root of the problem for me was that I lost the feeling of fascination and curiosity I had for math and programming, and doing this write-up helped me tap into that feeling of childlike wonder that used to come easily.

CBLT a day ago

Well written! Would you mind sharing how you came up with the "middle out" numbering system? I can never seem to come up with something this inspired when I'm doing math problems by myself.

  • chriskw a day ago

    The post presents it a bit out of order, but it was mostly from realizing at some point that the way the fractal grows by a factor of 5, base 5 number systems, and the "spiral" mentioned in the post can all fit together. I also thought a lot about how to programmatically draw the fractal and a natural way would be to start from the middle and zoom out.

    There's an apocryphal story about Richard Feynman about how he used to keep a dozen or so random problems in the back of his mind and made a little bit of progress on them every time he saw a connection, until finally he'd solve one and everyone would think he magically figured it out instantly. This was a bit similar except I'm not nearly at that level and I've only been able to do that for one problem instead of a dozen.

Tade0 10 hours ago

> Deciding to delegate to a future version of me that knows more math

Relatable. Huge part of my decision on what degree to pursue was a list of problems (mostly linear algebra) I needed to solve, but didn't have the guidance (and internet connection) to.

leni536 a day ago

Got a bit nerd-sniped by this and came up with an L-system that fills out (I think) "the wallflower":

https://onlinetools.com/math/l-system-generator?draw=AB&skip...

edit: On second thought, this probably generates the other fractal, but I'm not sure.

tcshit 19 hours ago

Nice writeup! I was hoping to see a photo of the fractal on your wall.. Nice link to Knuth video that I somehow have missed.

  • leephillips 19 hours ago

    Isn’t that it on the left in the last image?

    • tcshit 12 hours ago

      Yeah, maybe it is. It would be cool to make it much bigger, frame it and put it on the wall. Or create a mosaic tiled artwork, similar to Knuth’s dragon curve wall.

      • chriskw 11 hours ago

        Yeah, it's in the last image and in the thumbnail at very top (which I realize now is really hard to spot on mobile), intentionally not in the spotlight to leave space for the twist at the end.

        https://chriskw.xyz/images/fractal/thumbnail.jpg

        I think it would work perfectly as a mosaic eventually, but for the time being I'm perfectly content with the "rustic" 8x11 graph paper sized one taped to the wall. Currently planning to put up a slice of the orthotopeflower as a companion piece once I find matches for the colored pencils I used back then.

kragen 8 hours ago

This is beautiful. Thank you.

867-5309 9 hours ago

well, that escalated beautifully

Scene_Cast2 a day ago

I wonder if something similar can be applied to get a dither pattern with built-in level of detail adjustment.

entropicdrifter a day ago

Kinda looks like a propeller

  • shermantanktop a day ago

    Things with four arms that all curve the same way unfortunately tend to look swastika-ish.

    • leni536 a day ago

      The the arms of the author's "wallflower" fractal don't seem to curve, as opposed to the other, similar fractal (quadratic von Koch island). Which can be explained by each iteration adding a mirroring.

    • winnit 9 hours ago

      The unfortunate thing here is that the swastika was appropriated by a genocidal regime. The symbol still has a totally different life in India and Japan.

bdamm a day ago

That was fun.

matt3210 14 hours ago

Now make a tiling game engine that uses these!

olivergregory a day ago

[flagged]

  • 0003 a day ago

    It's an ingroup joke but also a true warning: "Handwaving" Anyone who delves deeply into something reaches a part where they can't articulate a developing theory and hand-wave around it -- hoping you "get" it.